Silence of The Lambs
🕑 Added 2020-10-19 21:39:37 +0000 UTCBuffalo Bill is much more terrifying to me than Hannibal Lecter ever was. Anyone else agree?
Comments
Tony Moro
I’m watching this tonight!
Wolfman Brandon
I don't know who that is. I've only seen the original Connery Bond films.
Deepfocuslens
Yeah, I mean, that's part of the character of course. But, the way it comes off is to me really over the top and lame. I don't like the performance at all.
Deepfocuslens
Silva direct influence
Deepfocuslens
Yeah. Though for me I go so far as to say, I am not a fan of Hannibal Lecter or Hopkins and his portrayal of him. It felt hammy, and as if it belonged in an entirely different film.
Tony Moro
Yes indeed!! He was basically the main killer anyway. Hannibal was intimidating but Buffalo Bill made you feel VERY uncomfortable!!
Ryan
"Goodbye, Horses" plays in the background, he applies his lipstick, tucks his penis in between his legs, says "I'd fuck me" lol Agreed. I think the sexual proclivities of Buffalo Bill play a role in making him a more terrifying character. There's a psycho-sexual element to his madness. The fact that he wears the skin of slain females in an attempt to make himself appear female really conveys some severe issues with his identity that makes him more fascinating (and terrifying) than simply being a cannibal (though Lector is quite terrifying as well- that intense stare he has is very terrifying).
Wolfman Brandon
They're both fantastic but Bill is definitely the more realistic killer. Hannibal is more like a James Bond villain with cannibalism but still effective.
Christian Sanaploianu
Definitely!
Tyler Shobe
For sure. Hannibal also had a certain civility to him whereas Buffalo Bill felt a lot more unpredictable. Plus the guy WEARS humans. That's way grosser and more unnerving than eating them.
Gavin Wegener
Anthony Hopkins in that film is so pretentious it hurts