RunFaps
Sabine
Sabine patreon

Science News April 26

🕑 Added 2023-04-26 15:00:06 +0000 UTC
Science News April 26

Comments

Happy Tuesday Eric! I'd like to see field biologists develop humane processes that would end their killing of wildlife to become specimens, such as in taking genetic samples and using smaller, portable field technology for imaging internal structures to replace the physical need. So, do you feel that MRI machines can be reduced in size for field use? I've never worked on MRIs and so would like the opinion of someone who has.

We can keep Die Deutsche Physikerin, though? https://youtu.be/NrswlFxEiV4

Choices, choices ^^

Thanks, I very much appreciate the additional context. Please allow me to clarify that what I said was that they did it by using a strong magnet plus advanced data processing. At least that was my, admittedly rather limited, understanding of the paper.

Hi Sabine, medical physicist here. I'd like to offer you some constructive criticism on the mouse brain story you reported. The first is your comparison of the 9.4T mouse brain scans with the typical 1.5T scanners found in hospitals. Mice are going to be scanned with what is called a preclinical scanner, a much smaller device that has been able to reach those tesla levels and higher for decades. The second is your statement that the Tesla of the scanner is driving the resolution improvements. Not exactly. What higher Tesla scanners enable is better resolution over time, which is indeed the medically important parameter. However the resolution is really limited by the range of the gradient coils, which limits the bandwidth of the Fourier-transformed image the MRI machine produces. The issue that higher Tesla helps to solve is that, if the gradient coils are cranked too hard at a lower Tesla the image will be overwhelmingly noise. However the noise is white and can be removed over extended period s of time by averaging. So very high resolution images of a cadaver can indeed be obtained in a 1.5T scanner if it is left to run for a few days, although at some point the gradient coils reach their limits. There are in fact 9+T scanners for humans but they have not contributed much to science. This is because physiological tremor is wider than the resolution advantages so in the images with living people, the potential resolution advantage is blurred out, and with a corpse they can just use a lower Tesla scanner and average the images overnight.

Fair call.

If I had to keep one, at this point I'd keep Mark and definitely send Elon back instead.

The Duke 9.4 Tesla MRI is pretty impressive. I know the University of Minnesota does that sort of research, too. I see that they are using a 10.5 Tesla magnet: https://med.umn.edu/radiology/research/center-magnetic-resonance. No mice brain images, though.

No but can Luke and his mates take Elon back too, PLEASE!?

I love these science news updates.


More Creators